Link to this page
Continuity of care
Last uploaded:
September 25, 2024
Acronym | CONTSONTO |
Visibility | Public |
Description | The Ontology of Continuity of care (ContSOnto) is an emerging research area consisting of the extension of a healthcare ontology to inform the continuity of care domain. This field is positioned at the confluence of health informatics, nursing informatics, process modelling, and artificial intelligence. This research relating to ContSOnto is underpinned by health informatics standard ISO 13940 Systems of Concepts for Continuity of Care ContSOnto focuses on how information flows from different information systems across and between services for clinical applications and health care professionals to use. Figure 14.2 provides an illustration (see https://contsys.org/pages/Guest%20blog/FormalOntology)of how the different classes and relationships in the standard are represented. The subject of care refers to the individual service user and health care actors can be human or non-human, for example, a health care professional or an organization. We have added concepts related to social determinants of health (SDH) in version 1.6. |
Status | Alpha |
Format | OWL |
Language | English |
Contact | contributor: Dr. Pamela Hussey, pamela.hussey@dcu.ie creator: Subhashis Das, subhashis@usal.es |
Categories | Health |
Version | Released | Uploaded | Downloads |
---|---|---|---|
1.6 (Parsed, Indexed, Metrics, Annotator) | 03/24/2024 | 09/25/2024 | OWL | CSV | RDF/XML | Diff |
1.5 (Archived) | 04/30/2023 | 04/30/2023 | OWL | Diff |
1.4 (Archived) | 01/02/2021 | 03/11/2021 | OWL | Diff |
1.3 (Archived) | 01/02/2021 | 01/17/2021 | OWL | Diff |
1.2 (Archived) | 09/04/2020 | 09/04/2020 | OWL | Diff |
1.1 (Archived) | 08/11/2020 | 08/11/2020 | OWL |
more... |
No views of CONTSONTO available
Jump to:
Id | http://ontology.ip.rm.cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite#Process
http://ontology.ip.rm.cnr.it/ontologies/DOLCE-Lite#Process
|
---|---|
Preferred Name | process |
Definitions |
set of interrelated or interacting activities that use inputs to deliver an intended result
Within stative occurrences, we distinguish between states and processes according to homeomericity: sitting is classified as a state but running is classified as a process, since there are (very short) temporal parts of a running that are not themselves runnings. In general, processes differ from situations because they are not assumed to have a description from which they depend. They can be sequenced by some course, but they do not require a description as a unifying criterion. On the other hand, at any time, one can conceive a description that asserts the constraints by which a process of a certian type is such, and in this case, it becomes a situation. Since the decision of designing an explicit description that unifies a perdurant depends on context, task, interest, application, etc., when aligning an ontology do DLP, there can be indecision on where to align a process-oriented class. For example, in the WordNet alignment, we have decided to put only some physical processes under 'process', e.g. 'organic process', in order to stress the social orientedness of DLP. But whereas we need to talk explicitly of the criteria by which we conceive organic processes, these will be put under 'situation'. Similar considerations are made for the other types of perdurants in DOLCE. A different notion of event (dealing with change) is currently investigated for further developments: being 'achievement', 'accomplishment', 'state', 'event', etc. can be also considered 'aspects' of processes or of parts of them. For example, the same process 'rock erosion in the Sinni valley' can be conceptualized as an accomplishment (what has brought the current state that e.g. we are trying to explain), as an achievement (the erosion process as the result of a previous accomplishment), as a state (if we collapse the time interval of the erosion into a time point), or as an event (what has changed our focus from a state to another). In the erosion case, we could have good motivations to shift from one aspect to another: a) causation focus, b) effectual focus, c) condensation d) transition (causality). If we want to consider all the aspects of a process together, we need to postulate a unifying descriptive set of criteria (i.e. a 'description'), according to which that process is circumstantiated in a 'situation'. The different aspects will arise as a parts of a same situation.
|
Type | http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class |
All Properties
label | process
|
---|---|
comment | set of interrelated or interacting activities that use inputs to deliver an intended result
Within stative occurrences, we distinguish between states and processes according to homeomericity: sitting is classified as a state but running is classified as a process, since there are (very short) temporal parts of a running that are not themselves runnings. In general, processes differ from situations because they are not assumed to have a description from which they depend. They can be sequenced by some course, but they do not require a description as a unifying criterion. On the other hand, at any time, one can conceive a description that asserts the constraints by which a process of a certian type is such, and in this case, it becomes a situation. Since the decision of designing an explicit description that unifies a perdurant depends on context, task, interest, application, etc., when aligning an ontology do DLP, there can be indecision on where to align a process-oriented class. For example, in the WordNet alignment, we have decided to put only some physical processes under 'process', e.g. 'organic process', in order to stress the social orientedness of DLP. But whereas we need to talk explicitly of the criteria by which we conceive organic processes, these will be put under 'situation'. Similar considerations are made for the other types of perdurants in DOLCE. A different notion of event (dealing with change) is currently investigated for further developments: being 'achievement', 'accomplishment', 'state', 'event', etc. can be also considered 'aspects' of processes or of parts of them. For example, the same process 'rock erosion in the Sinni valley' can be conceptualized as an accomplishment (what has brought the current state that e.g. we are trying to explain), as an achievement (the erosion process as the result of a previous accomplishment), as a state (if we collapse the time interval of the erosion into a time point), or as an event (what has changed our focus from a state to another). In the erosion case, we could have good motivations to shift from one aspect to another: a) causation focus, b) effectual focus, c) condensation d) transition (causality). If we want to consider all the aspects of a process together, we need to postulate a unifying descriptive set of criteria (i.e. a 'description'), according to which that process is circumstantiated in a 'situation'. The different aspects will arise as a parts of a same situation.
|
prefLabel | process
|
subClassOf | |
type |
Add comment
Delete | Subject | Author | Type | Created |
---|---|---|---|---|
No notes to display |
- Problem retrieving properties:
Notes
Filter:
Add NCBO Web Widgets to your site for CONTSONTO
Widget type | Widget demonstration |
---|---|
|
Step 2: Follow the Instructions
For more help visit NCBO Widget Wiki |
|
Example 1 (start typing the class name to get its full URI)
Example 2 (get the ID for a class) Example 3 (get the preferred name for a class) Step 2: Follow the Instructions
For more help visit NCBO Widget Wiki |
|
Step 2: Follow the InstructionsCopy the code below and paste it to your HTML page <iframe frameborder="0" src="/widgets/visualization?ontology=CONTSONTO&class=https%3A%2F%2Fcontsys.org%2Fconcept%2Fresource&apikey=YOUR_API_KEY"></iframe> For more help visit NCBO Widget Wiki |
|
Step 2: Follow the InstructionsCopy the code below and paste it to your HTML page <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/widgets/jquery.ncbo.tree.css"> <script src="/widgets/jquery.ncbo.tree-2.0.2.js"></script> <div id="widget_tree"></div> var widget_tree = $("#widget_tree").NCBOTree({ apikey: "YOUR_API_KEY", ontology: "CONTSONTO" }); You can also view a detailed demonstration For more help visit NCBO Widget Wiki |