does not fit to taxonomy
submitted by
about 13 years ago
Hi all,
to my view, "osseus" does not really fit as a child of "disc composition" as it can appear in many other contexts. A good terminology practice would be to name the preferred terms in a unique way, e.g. "osseus disc composition" and put the term "osseous" on a place such as Qualifier "value->Appearance->osseous".
What do you think?
All the best
Philipp
Thanks, Philipp, we agree that the terms in this category more correctly belong in the "composition" class. We will move them there and move the class "disc composition" to Obsolete Radlex terms, since this term does not seem necessary.
Beverly